Answering Jason Beck’s mailbag: Part 2
Dipping into Jason Beck’s mailbag for blogging inspiration, I give you my answers to questions asked of the Tigers MLB.com writer. And isn’t mailbag a weird term when you think about it…?
Inspired by Big Al’s blogging over Lynn Henning’s shoulder, I thought I’d blog through Jason Beck’s mailbag. Being a fan of Beck’s work, I’ve been reading his mailbag pretty religiously looking for any excuse to answer some questions, but he fielded a lot of questions that didn’t lend themselves to analysis — until today’s edition. So here I am. Like last time, I don’t intend to steal the content, so click the link to read Beck’s responses.
Does anyone foresee a timing problem with new shortstop Edgar Renteria and Placido Polanco? Polanco obviously is one of the better second baseman in the game, but he has gotten used to Carlos Guillen’s tendencies and vice versa. Will this just be a growing pain of training camp?
Me: I don’t forsee any problems. Yeah, there’s always a session where the players have to adapt to each other. But I think you can probably overrate the need for longtime chemistry between two middle infielders. It’s not like we saw big chemistry dropoffs when someone subbed as shortstop or second baseman.
What will be more interesting to watch is how Renteria and Miguel Cabrera work out the left side of the infield. There, players have to adapt to each other’s range. Who gets the ball in the middle? Is the third baseman going too far to get the shortstop’s ball? That sort of thing. Not only are the two left infielders new to the team, they’re new to each other and new to Comerica Park. So we’ll have to key our eyes on how that develops more than how the double-play duo works.
I cannot bear it anymore! I’m sick. I need to know what the mock lineup is. Is Miguel Cabrera going to hit third or fourth? Will Gary Sheffield hit fifth? Please help me before I go crazy. Thank you.
Sure, why not. Of course, as soon as the season is two weeks old, it wouldn’t look like this. And finally, the lefty-righty thing probably shouldn’t work out quite like, at least not against a right-handed pitcher. In fact, I don’t even think this lineup is idea. But I do think this is what Leyland might consider doing.
- Granderson, CF (L)
- Polanco, 2B (R)
- Sheffield, DH (R)
- Ordonez, RF (R)
- Cabrera, 3B(R)
- Guillen, 1B (S)
- Renteria, SS (R)
- Jones, LF (L)
- Rodriguez, C (R)
What’s more ideal from an everyday standpoint? I like:
- Granderson, CF (L)
- Polanco, 2B (R)
- Guillen, 1B (S)
- Cabrera, 3B (R)
- Ordonez, RF (R)
- Sheffield DH (R)
- Renteria SS (R)
- Jones LF (L)
- Rodriguez C (R)
It seems to me the Tigers should address the issue of where to draw the line between players playing hurt and putting them on the disabled list to get healthy. Last year, Jeremy Bonderman and Sheffield had long periods of poor production while trying to play hurt. This is detrimental to the team and cost them a number of wins. How can teams recognize a player is hurt earlier and know when it’s time to stick him on the DL because he’s not getting better? I respect that players want to tough it out and play though injuries, but at some point it’s not worth it.
The Bonderman thing should never have snuck through. I think the culture of the locker room has to be “Play through a minor injury, but if you’re a pitcher, open your damn mouth before you really hurt yourself.” Because it really is hard to figure out if a guy is hurt if he’s not telling you. They have got to feel it’s their duty to talk, so as not to hurt the team like Bonderman did. I hope it served as an example. Better safe than sorry.
So let me get this straight, Detroit is going to pay Nate Robertson $21.25 million over three years. Scott Kazmir, the ace for Tampa Bay, just agreed to a one-year deal for $3.785 million. Now, am I crazy, or is it crazy that Detroit is going to pay their fourth, maybe even fifth, starting pitcher almost $6 million-$7 million more than Tampa Bay’s ace? Robertson is coming off a sub-par season, and I think that money was a little too much for him. We should be focusing on locking up Cabrera long-term and even Justin Verlander before we shell out that much money for the end of the rotation.
As Beck pointed out, this situation isn’t the same. Kazmir is under club control — arbitration eligible. They weren’t buying him out of free agency or giving a multiyear contract. Basically, the Tigers were figuring they’d pay Robertson pretty close to what they’re paying for 08 and 09 anyway. They were probably figuring in 2010, it would be hard to sign a pitchre of Robertson’s ablity for any cheaper than the 10-11M or so he’ll make. So really, it made sense
As for Cabrera and Verlander, I’m sure the Tigers do want to add years to their stays in Detroit. I don’t think this deal precludes that, because as I said, they were going to pay that much for pitching anyway.
How many different positions can Brandon Inge really play without it being a setback for the team?
8.5. Seriously, I think he can fill in as pitcher if necessary. But to be effective, which I guess was the spirit of the question, I’m going to assume 7. I’m going to leave off shortstop and pitcher, although Inge was a shortstop in a former life and I’m sure could play shortstop now. I just think it’s best if they leave the shortstopping to a more experienced player. Anything else, I have faith he can play.
Jason, I love reading your mailbags. It puzzles me, however, that trivial questions like players’ uniform numbers or Spring Training reporting dates take up space in the column, when this information clearly is listed within the Tigers Web site. If they can’t find that information, they’re likely not going to be able to find their way back to the mailbag! Keep up the good work.
Kinda wondered that myself. That’s the reason I haven’t really been able to dip into his mailbag.
Sphere Itposted in 2007-08 offseason, Analysis, Jason Beck's Mailbag | 1 Comment
