<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Game 45: Tigers&#8217; offense, bullpen also go boom</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mackavenuetigers.com/2008/05/20/game-45-tigers-offense-bullpen-also-go-boom/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mackavenuetigers.com/2008/05/20/game-45-tigers-offense-bullpen-also-go-boom/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 21:03:36 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kaos</title>
		<link>http://www.mackavenuetigers.com/2008/05/20/game-45-tigers-offense-bullpen-also-go-boom/#comment-31143</link>
		<dc:creator>Kaos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 05:05:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mackavenuetigers.com/?p=1289#comment-31143</guid>
		<description>Correction: Rod and Mario, when they referred to the 23 straight solo homeruns, were talking about Curtis Granderson not the Tigers as a whole.  They followed up that comment by saying that most of that had to do with him batting lead-off.  Tiger's have hit homeruns with guys on base this year.  But, definitely not very many.

Anyway, it was great to see the Tiger's hit again.  Not so great to see them almost blow it.  I would much rather see their ability to add on runs improve than just getting a bunch all at once.  Give me a game of six one run innings over one five run inning any day.  We can't just get a big lead and then take it easy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Correction: Rod and Mario, when they referred to the 23 straight solo homeruns, were talking about Curtis Granderson not the Tigers as a whole.  They followed up that comment by saying that most of that had to do with him batting lead-off.  Tiger&#8217;s have hit homeruns with guys on base this year.  But, definitely not very many.</p>
<p>Anyway, it was great to see the Tiger&#8217;s hit again.  Not so great to see them almost blow it.  I would much rather see their ability to add on runs improve than just getting a bunch all at once.  Give me a game of six one run innings over one five run inning any day.  We can&#8217;t just get a big lead and then take it easy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Flying J</title>
		<link>http://www.mackavenuetigers.com/2008/05/20/game-45-tigers-offense-bullpen-also-go-boom/#comment-31137</link>
		<dc:creator>Flying J</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 23:01:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mackavenuetigers.com/?p=1289#comment-31137</guid>
		<description>BUGNUTS AND AWESOME

While the Tigers may be a very disappointing baseball team this year, they DO NOT DISAPPOINT when it comes to crazy drama.  There's nothing I don't absolutely love about the Grilli comments and the grizzled bleeps in response.

Here's the thing though.  First, WDFN made some interesting points about "chemistry."  Much of the dissent about a lack of "chemistry" is coming from white players (Grilli and Inge lamenting the departure of Casey)  Could this claim of chemistry be coming from disgruntled white players who now feel that the clubhouse is "too Latin?"  I hope not, but that's WDFN's theory.  It's a very interesting take and I think it's not without merit to consider that there may be a weird racial undercurrent to the clubhouse blues.  Sad but perhaps true.  

Second, for Leyand to dismiss all this as "not being the problem...it's between the lines" is a bit naive.  All workplaces have environments that change and alter productivity.  If the players don't get along, it matters.  If there are crazy cliques, it matters.  Though I am heartened by the fact that Leyland vows that "you wanna play (bleep)-in games?  I'll play games ever (bleep)-in games"  I'm not saying that the players all have to do trust falls or drop peyote and wander the desert together (though that would be pretty cool to see), but look at the high socks issue.  That was a brilliant (alright for baseball players) scheme to concoct team chemistry.  And how long did it last?  One game.  Meh.

Third, Willis to the bullpen now?  It's all awesome and crazy.  I only hope that one of the ballplayers is talking to an imaginary blond in a red dress (that's for you Stacey).

How do you fix?  Who cares sorta.  This is going to be awesome.  The Tigs are probably already out of the playoff hunt, but I'll gladly trade that for a summer of tirades and clubhouse fights.  Bring the chaos.

BUG.  NUTS.  It's the word of the year.  It hereby replaces the Pistons "That's Bananas" of a few years back.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BUGNUTS AND AWESOME</p>
<p>While the Tigers may be a very disappointing baseball team this year, they DO NOT DISAPPOINT when it comes to crazy drama.  There&#8217;s nothing I don&#8217;t absolutely love about the Grilli comments and the grizzled bleeps in response.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s the thing though.  First, WDFN made some interesting points about &#8220;chemistry.&#8221;  Much of the dissent about a lack of &#8220;chemistry&#8221; is coming from white players (Grilli and Inge lamenting the departure of Casey)  Could this claim of chemistry be coming from disgruntled white players who now feel that the clubhouse is &#8220;too Latin?&#8221;  I hope not, but that&#8217;s WDFN&#8217;s theory.  It&#8217;s a very interesting take and I think it&#8217;s not without merit to consider that there may be a weird racial undercurrent to the clubhouse blues.  Sad but perhaps true.  </p>
<p>Second, for Leyand to dismiss all this as &#8220;not being the problem&#8230;it&#8217;s between the lines&#8221; is a bit naive.  All workplaces have environments that change and alter productivity.  If the players don&#8217;t get along, it matters.  If there are crazy cliques, it matters.  Though I am heartened by the fact that Leyland vows that &#8220;you wanna play (bleep)-in games?  I&#8217;ll play games ever (bleep)-in games&#8221;  I&#8217;m not saying that the players all have to do trust falls or drop peyote and wander the desert together (though that would be pretty cool to see), but look at the high socks issue.  That was a brilliant (alright for baseball players) scheme to concoct team chemistry.  And how long did it last?  One game.  Meh.</p>
<p>Third, Willis to the bullpen now?  It&#8217;s all awesome and crazy.  I only hope that one of the ballplayers is talking to an imaginary blond in a red dress (that&#8217;s for you Stacey).</p>
<p>How do you fix?  Who cares sorta.  This is going to be awesome.  The Tigs are probably already out of the playoff hunt, but I&#8217;ll gladly trade that for a summer of tirades and clubhouse fights.  Bring the chaos.</p>
<p>BUG.  NUTS.  It&#8217;s the word of the year.  It hereby replaces the Pistons &#8220;That&#8217;s Bananas&#8221; of a few years back.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blake</title>
		<link>http://www.mackavenuetigers.com/2008/05/20/game-45-tigers-offense-bullpen-also-go-boom/#comment-31123</link>
		<dc:creator>Blake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 14:44:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mackavenuetigers.com/?p=1289#comment-31123</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I liked how Leyland yanked the relievers when it looked like they were struggling.  I like the attitude of, "If you can't get the job done we will find someone who can".  I think Leyland and Dombrowski should make sure the players understand that.  If you can't get the job done then you won't play as much, simple as that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I liked how Leyland yanked the relievers when it looked like they were struggling.  I like the attitude of, &#8220;If you can&#8217;t get the job done we will find someone who can&#8221;.  I think Leyland and Dombrowski should make sure the players understand that.  If you can&#8217;t get the job done then you won&#8217;t play as much, simple as that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
